On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 10:54:12PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> Contents are the same. I decided to leave the "; do" as it
> matches the rest of the script. If we're going to fix it, we
> should do them all.
Like this, perhaps.
I didn't go on a crusade against "; do" in the other scripts, but
perhaps that is low-hanging fruit that somebody else might want to pick.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] t5310: fix "; do" style
Our usual shell style is to put the "do" of a loop on its
own line, like:
while $cond
do
something
done
instead of:
while $cond; do
something
done
We have a bit of both in our code base, but the former is
what's in CodingGuidelines (and outnumbers the latter in t/
by about 6:1).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
---
t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh b/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh
index c3ddfa217..20e2473a0 100755
--- a/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh
+++ b/t/t5310-pack-bitmaps.sh
@@ -20,11 +20,13 @@ has_any () {
}
test_expect_success 'setup repo with moderate-sized history' '
- for i in $(test_seq 1 10); do
+ for i in $(test_seq 1 10)
+ do
test_commit $i
done &&
git checkout -b other HEAD~5 &&
- for i in $(test_seq 1 10); do
+ for i in $(test_seq 1 10)
+ do
test_commit side-$i
done &&
git checkout master &&
@@ -104,7 +106,8 @@ test_expect_success 'clone from bitmapped repository' '
'
test_expect_success 'setup further non-bitmapped commits' '
- for i in $(test_seq 1 10); do
+ for i in $(test_seq 1 10)
+ do
test_commit further-$i
done
'
@@ -300,7 +303,8 @@ test_expect_success 'set up reusable pack' '
test_expect_success 'pack reuse respects --honor-pack-keep' '
test_when_finished "rm -f .git/objects/pack/*.keep" &&
- for i in .git/objects/pack/*.pack; do
+ for i in .git/objects/pack/*.pack
+ do
>${i%.pack}.keep
done &&
reusable_pack --honor-pack-keep >empty.pack &&
--
2.13.0.rc2.436.g524cea07c