Re: [PATCH] diff.c: Fix whitespace issues due to a mismerge(?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> It looks like all these lines were introduced by one of the conflict chunks
> in 4af9a7d344 (Merge branch 'bc/object-id', 2016-09-19). Viewing that
> commit in gitk, the indentation seems fine, i.e. there is just one
> whitespace in front of the lines, as you would expect from a formatted
> patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>  Junio, 
>  I do not think it is worth to apply this patch on its own,
>  but maybe it is worth to investigate your setup? (Assuming it is
>  git that did the merge, we may have a bug in whitespacing and
>  merge conflicts.)

Thanks for spotting.  

I do not think you have to worry about any bug in Git-the-program
with this merge.  If you try to reproduce the merge yourself (which
by the way is easy to do, with "M=4af9a7d344 && git checkout $M^ &&
git merge $M^2"), you'll see that quite a lot of changes made to
"builtin/apply.c" had to be hand-ported to the corresponding lines
that are now in "apply.c" at the top-level, because in the meantime
13b5af22 ("apply: move libified code from builtin/apply.c to
apply.{c,h}", 2016-04-22) moved things around while the merged side
branch has been cooking.  

It is very likely that manual killing and yanking in Emacs
introduced the screw-up.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]