Re: Questions about validation/verification done for Git Software

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Questions about validation/verification done for Git Software
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 10:51:42 +0900
Cc: "git\@vger.kernel.org" <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <504208edac024b2dba0c1743dc86683e@AMUSATLWP20005.alereinc.com> (Todd Robertson's message of "Mon, 8 May 2017 17:14:51 +0000")
References: <504208edac024b2dba0c1743dc86683e@AMUSATLWP20005.alereinc.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

"Robertson, Todd" <Todd.Robertson@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Is the software FDA certified?

No, Git is toxic and are not approved for human consumption ;-).

References:
- Questions about validation/verification done for Git Software
  - From: Robertson, Todd

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] Move textconv_object to be with other textconv methods
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: disable pack reuse for object-selection options
Previous by thread: Re: Questions about validation/verification done for Git Software
Next by thread: [PATCH] diff.c: Fix whitespace issues due to a mismerge(?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]