Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> It's just to bring us in line with upstream which as noted in that
> commit has fixed the issues we locally patched (and more), and for us
> to stop maintaining a fork of an old version of part of Gawk.
>
> There's no known issue with the existing engine that I'm aware of
> which impacts git, but given ~7 years of bugfixes & improvements
> there's surely something.
>
>> Having these "fixup!" as separate patches on the list makes them
>> smaller and easier to understand. What do we want to do with them
>> once they are applied? Squash them all up, because these do not
>> have their own explanations in their log message and it is not worth
>> keeping them separate?
>
> Please squash them all up into this commit ("compat/regex: update the
> gawk regex engine from upstream"), as noted having them as separate
> patches was a hack to get around mailing list limits.
>
> Also, un-squashed they'd break the NO_REGEX=Y build for a few commits,
> which would be a pain during bisecting.
OK. Thanks for clarification.