Hi, Jean-Noel Avila wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jean-Noel Avila <jn.avila@xxxxxxx> As with the previous patches, this is a good place to put the motivation for the patch. > --- > git-filter-branch.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/git-filter-branch.sh b/git-filter-branch.sh > index 2b8cdba15..dd3a605d0 100755 > --- a/git-filter-branch.sh > +++ b/git-filter-branch.sh > @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ git rev-parse --no-flags --revs-only --symbolic-full-name \ > sed -e '/^^/d' "$tempdir"/raw-heads >"$tempdir"/heads > > test -s "$tempdir"/heads || > - die "Which ref do you want to rewrite?" > + die "You must specify a ref to rewrite" I find both the old and the new messages pretty uncompelling. The user got the usage wrong but we don't know what they were trying to do --- e.g. maybe they specified the ref to rewrite but in the wrong place. Would e.g. a simple call to 'usage' work? Thanks, Jonathan