"Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/10/07, Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@xxxxxx> wrote: >> I'll post a patch soon that takes the best of both: Call cvs status >> once with the list of touched files and parse the output. Only one >> connection is needed and only the minimal amount of status data is >> transferred. > > Yes, please :-) I wrote cvsexportcommit originally, and use it on a > huge cvs checkout that is hosted on SF.net (slow!). My commits are > small (3~5 files). I agree with using only one connection so commits > with many files are sanity-checked faster, but status needs to ask > explicitly about the files it's about to touch. > > cheers, Sounds like you are perfect guinea pig. A test in the real-life use followed by an Ack is very appreciated. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
