Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
I obviously agree with this.  As I said a few times I regret
introducing "add -i" --- it encourages a wrong workflow, in that
what you commit in steps never match what you had in the working
tree and could have tested until the very end.

On the other hand, not all changes require any testing at all. For example, if you're using git to manage documentation, it is totally reasonable to commit a fix for a simple spelling error in one part of a file while not committing an in-progress rewrite of another part.

-Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux