On 05/02, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ævar, > > > > On Sun, 30 Apr 2017, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> * ab/grep-pcre-v2 (2017-04-25) 20 commits > >> - SQUASH??? > >> - Makefile & configure: make PCRE v2 the default PCRE implementation > >> - grep: remove support for concurrent use of both PCRE v1 & v2 > >> - grep: add support for PCRE v2 > >> - grep: add support for the PCRE v1 JIT API > >> - perf: add a performance comparison test of grep -E and -P > >> - grep: change the internal PCRE code & header names to be PCRE1 > >> - grep: change the internal PCRE macro names to be PCRE1 > >> - test-lib: rename the LIBPCRE prerequisite to PCRE > >> - grep: make grep.patternType=[pcre|pcre1] a synonym for "perl" > >> - grep & rev-list doc: stop promising libpcre for --perl-regexp > >> - log: add -P as a synonym for --perl-regexp > >> - log: add exhaustive tests for pattern style options & config > >> - grep: add a test for backreferences in PCRE patterns > >> - Makefile & configure: reword outdated comment about PCRE > >> - grep: remove redundant `regflags &= ~REG_EXTENDED` assignments > >> - grep: remove redundant regflags assignment under PCRE > >> - grep: submodule-related case statements should die if new fields are added > >> - grep: add tests for grep pattern types being passed to submodules > >> - grep: amend submodule recursion test in preparation for rx engine testing > >> > >> PCRE2, which has an API different from and incompatible with PCRE, > >> can now be chosen to support "grep -P -e '<pattern>'" and friends. > > > > FWIW for quite a couple of recent builds, `pu` fails on Windows with a > > variation of this error: > > > > CC blob.o > > In file included from revision.h:5:0, > > from bisect.c:4: > > grep.h:16:19: fatal error: pcre2.h: No such file or directory > > #include <pcre2.h> > > ^ > > compilation terminated. > > > > Maybe this can be fixed before hitting `next`? > > This will be due to a combination of the build machine not having pcre > v2 (but having v1) & my "Makefile & configure: make PCRE v2 the > default PCRE implementation" patch, which makes v2 the default for > USE_LIBPCRE=YesPlease. > > Is it easy to install v2 on these build machines? Alternatively that > patch could be ejected out of pu, or you could USE_LIBPCRE1=YesPlease > to use v1, but as explained in that commit I think it makes sense to > make v2 the default. Shouldn't the Makefile check for the existence of PCREv2 before making it the default? -- Brandon Williams