Re: failing test t9400 (Re: [PATCH] git-update-ref: add --no-deref option for overwriting/detaching ref)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frank Lichtenheld <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 09:19:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > Shouldn't these tests be skipped if I don't have all that stuff installed?
>> > There doesn't even seem to be an option to turn off these tests.
>> 
>> I agree.  We would need something like this, but I have no easy
>> way to test it myself, short of uninstalling what I need on the
>> box.  As you do not have them, maybe you can give it a quick
>> whirl?
>
> Yeah, I totally forgot add such a check, even though I added one for
> cvs.
>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/t/t9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh b/t/t9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh
>> index f17be6b..98d6bb4 100755
>> --- a/t/t9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh
>> +++ b/t/t9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh
>> @@ -17,6 +17,11 @@ then
>>      test_done
>>      exit
>>  fi
>> +perl -e 'use DBI; use DBD::SQLite' 2>&1 || {
>
> Maybe there is a >/dev/null missing here?

Yes, I have it in the committed version.  I wanted to make sure
Sven gets the expected error message from Perl in this test
patch.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux