Hi, On Wed, 9 May 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > The discussion about having a header to specify, for a revert commit, > what it reverts made me realize that this header *would* be useful, but > that we don't need a *new* header for it. I think that the right method > is to add the parent of the reverted commit as a second parent for the > revert. I am not so sure. In a sense, you are correct. But everybody who does "git log --no-merges" would no longer see reverts. Which is somewhat incorrect. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
