Re: [PATCH] read-cache: close index.lock in do_write_index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> From: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Teach do_write_index() to close the index.lock file
> before getting the mtime and updating the istate.timestamp
> fields.
>
> On Windows, a file's mtime is not updated until the file is
> closed.  On Linux, the mtime is set after the last flush.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Published-As: https://github.com/dscho/git/releases/tag/do-write-index-mtime-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/dscho/git do-write-index-mtime-v1
>
>  read-cache.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
> index 008b335844c..b0276fd5510 100644
> --- a/read-cache.c
> +++ b/read-cache.c
> @@ -2051,9 +2051,10 @@ void update_index_if_able(struct index_state *istate, struct lock_file *lockfile
>  		rollback_lock_file(lockfile);
>  }
>  
> -static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate, int newfd,
> +static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate, struct tempfile *tempfile,
>  			  int strip_extensions)
>  {
> +	int newfd = tempfile->fd;
>  	git_SHA_CTX c;
>  	struct cache_header hdr;
>  	int i, err, removed, extended, hdr_version;
> @@ -2162,7 +2163,11 @@ static int do_write_index(struct index_state *istate, int newfd,
>  			return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (ce_flush(&c, newfd, istate->sha1) || fstat(newfd, &st))
> +	if (ce_flush(&c, newfd, istate->sha1))
> +		return -1;
> +	if (close_tempfile(tempfile))
> +		return error(_("could not close '%s'"), tempfile->filename.buf);
> +	if (lstat(tempfile->filename.buf, &st))
>  		return -1;


stat/lstat with path may be slower than fstat on an open file
descriptor, and I think that is the reason why we do it this way,
but the performance difference would probably be unmeasurable and
does not matter in practice.

As we are not using the fact that we still have the file descriptor
open when we do the stat for any purpose (e.g. like locking other
processes out), this move to "close first and then stat" is a good
workaround for the problem.  I wonder if we have been seeing false
"racy git" problem more often due to this issue on Windows than
other platforms.

When code uses lstat, it gives a signal to the readers of the code
that the code is prepared to see a symlink and when it is a symlink
it wants to grab the property of the link itself, not the target of
the link.  I do not think the temporary index can be a symbolic
link, and even if that were the case, we do want the mtime of the
link target, so it is a wrong signal to give to the readers.  Hence,
it would be better to use stat() here from the readability's point
of view.  Of course, when the path is always a regular file, lstat()
vs stat() technically does not give any different result, so this
comment is purely about the maintainability, not about correctness.

Other than that, looks good to me.

>  	istate->timestamp.sec = (unsigned int)st.st_mtime;
>  	istate->timestamp.nsec = ST_MTIME_NSEC(st);
> @@ -2185,7 +2190,7 @@ static int commit_locked_index(struct lock_file *lk)
>  static int do_write_locked_index(struct index_state *istate, struct lock_file *lock,
>  				 unsigned flags)
>  {
> -	int ret = do_write_index(istate, get_lock_file_fd(lock), 0);
> +	int ret = do_write_index(istate, &lock->tempfile, 0);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  	assert((flags & (COMMIT_LOCK | CLOSE_LOCK)) !=
> @@ -2282,7 +2287,7 @@ static int write_shared_index(struct index_state *istate,
>  		return do_write_locked_index(istate, lock, flags);
>  	}
>  	move_cache_to_base_index(istate);
> -	ret = do_write_index(si->base, fd, 1);
> +	ret = do_write_index(si->base, &temporary_sharedindex, 1);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		delete_tempfile(&temporary_sharedindex);
>  		return ret;
>
> base-commit: e2cb6ab84c94f147f1259260961513b40c36108a



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]