Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] Specify explicitly where we parse timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Currently, Git's source code represents all timestamps as `unsigned
> long`. In preparation for using a more appropriate data type, let's
> introduce a symbol `parse_timestamp` (currently being defined to
> `strtoul`) where appropriate, so that we can later easily switch to,
> say, use `strtoull()` instead.

Apparently a very good first step in this series.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]