Re: [PATCH 2/2] clone: remember references for submodules even when not recursing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/11, Stefan Beller wrote:
> The commit 31224cbdc7 (clone: recursive and reference option triggers
> submodule alternates, 2016-08-17) argued for any further `submodule update`
> to respect the initial setup. This is not the case if you only pass
> '--reference[-if-able]' to the initial clone without instructing to
> recurse into submodules.
> 
> If there are submodules however the user is likely to later run
> a 'submodule update --init' to obtain the submodules. In this case we
> also want to have the references available.
> 

So the idea is to keep the references around even if the user doesn't
want to recurse immediately?

-- 
Brandon Williams



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]