Re: [FAQ?] Rationale for git's way to manage the index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 07:43:31PM CEST, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> A single liner "-m" is handy for "Oops, typofix in foo.c" kind
> of commit, but in such a case you literally would be changing
> only the typofix and won't have "edit foo.c; git add foo.c; edit
> foo.c; git commit" sequence anyway.

I don't get this argument - I frequently write quite long descriptions
inside the -m argument(s), since I just find it more convenient than
having to edit it in an editor, for various reasons. So there is really
no reason why the "-m is only for short single-liner commit messages"
hypothesis could hold true.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Ever try. Ever fail. No matter. // Try again. Fail again. Fail better.
		-- Samuel Beckett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux