Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> That's fine by me. We may want to pick up the segfault one separately >> (though I don't think it's security-interesting). > > Up to you, but in case it's less work for you & Junio I already have > it in my branch of fallout from this series/discussion, so if it's > easier for you/Junio I can submit it, and it would save my a tiny bit > of work since I could just base on master instead of some other > in-flight patch. Sure, with existing backlog I probably won't get around to it before you have a clean series anyway. It may not be a bad idea to base the patches on 'maint', though, if possible. Thanks.