Re: "up-to-date" vs. "up to date"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 04:34:16PM -0400, Jeffrey Manian wrote:
> Hello git community,
> 
> This is about an issue of language style and punctuation, not anything
> functional. Apologies in advance if I've brought this to the wrong
> place.
> 
> There are a bunch of situations in which git will print a message like
> "Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/master'" or "Already
> up-to-date."
> 
> In many of these cases, including the two examples I just gave, "up to
> date" should not be hyphenated --- at least according to most (if not
> all) English-language style guides.

Yes, the Chicago Manual of Style agrees that "[i]f the phrasal adjective
follows a verb, it is usually unhyphenated."  I often keep this rule in
mind when writing commit messages.

> Here are a couple posts in support of that, which also explain when it
> should and should not be hyphenated:
> https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/180611/do-i-keep-myself-up-to-date-or-up-to-date-on-something
> http://grammarist.com/usage/up-to-date/
> 
> And the Chromium community dealing with the same issue:
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/chromium-reviews/edodON6G2oY
> 
> I thought about submitting a patch, but I started looking through the
> source code and found that "up-to-date" appears 61 times. So before I
> get into that I thought I would check with the community to see if
> this is something that's already been debated and decided.

To my knowledge, we haven't discussed this issue before.  I'm not Junio,
so I can't speak for whether a patch would ultimately be accepted, but
I'm not opposed to seeing or reviewing such a patch.

Generally, the rule on the list is that unless the change is very large
or wide ranging, you'll find people are more likely to give you feedback
on a concrete patch (including whether the idea is desirable) than on an
idea in general.
-- 
brian m. carlson / brian with sandals: Houston, Texas, US
+1 832 623 2791 | https://www.crustytoothpaste.net/~bmc | My opinion only
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]