On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Add in a check to see if a submodule is active before attempting to >> recurse. This prevents 'ls-files' from trying to operate on a submodule >> which may not exist in the working directory. > > What would currently happen on recursing into non-active submodules? > Can we have a test for this? > > Thanks, > Stefan We should be able to test for this. Is it possible that we can recurse into a submodule as long as we have the clone in .git/modules/<name> even if we don't have it checked out currently? Thanks, Jake