Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] [GSoC] remove_subtree(): reimplement using iterators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey there! I'm sorry for bothering you, but any chance you might have
overlooked this patch for a review? (I'm just not familiar with how
long patches usually take to be reviewed, and since I always got an
answer within two days of sending it I wondered if you may have just
not noticed it.)

-- Daniel.

On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Daniel Ferreira <bnmvco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is the seventh version of a patch series that implements the GSoC
> microproject of converting a recursive call to readdir() to use dir_iterator.
>
> v1: https://public-inbox.org/git/CAGZ79kZwT-9mHTiOJ5CEjk2wDFkn6+NcogjX0=vjhsAh16ANYg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> v2: https://public-inbox.org/git/CACsJy8Dxh-QPBBLfaFWPAWUsbA9GVXA7x+mXLjEvYKhk1zOpig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> v3: https://public-inbox.org/git/CAGZ79kYtpmURSQWPumobA=e3JBFjKhWCdv_LPhKCd71ZRwMovA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> v4: https://public-inbox.org/git/1490747533-89143-1-git-send-email-bnmvco@xxxxxxxxx/T/#e437a63e0c22c00c69b5d92977c9b438ed2b9fd3a
> v5: https://public-inbox.org/git/1490844730-47634-1-git-send-email-bnmvco@xxxxxxxxx/T/#m2323f15e45de699f2e09364f40a62e17047cf453
> v6: https://public-inbox.org/git/1491107726-21504-1-git-send-email-bnmvco@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
> v7: https://public-inbox.org/git/1491163388-41255-1-git-send-email-bnmvco@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t
>
> Travis CI build: https://travis-ci.org/theiostream/git/jobs/219111182
>
> In this version, I applied pretty much all suggestions Michael and Stefan had
> for the patch.
>
> Michael, regarding the patch you sent for parsing the arguments on the
> test-dir-iterator helper, I did not squash because it'd generate too many
> merge conflicts. I just preferred add your code manually. Let me know how I
> can properly credit you for it.
>
> The only "controversial" part of this code is how I ended up caching the result
> of lstat() on the dir_iterator_level struct. Having to handle the case of the
> root directory ended up making set_iterator_data() way more complicated (having
> to handle the case of level->stat not being set by push_dir_level()), as well
> as required the introduction of st_is_set member in the level struct. This issue
> would be solved if we could lstat() the root dir on dir_iterator_begin() and
> possibly return an error there. Regardless, I appreciate other suggestions to
> make this less complex.
>
> Daniel Ferreira (5):
>   dir_iterator: add tests for dir_iterator API
>   remove_subtree(): test removing nested directories
>   dir_iterator: add helpers to dir_iterator_advance
>   dir_iterator: refactor state machine model
>   remove_subtree(): reimplement using iterators
>
>  Makefile                        |   1 +
>  dir-iterator.c                  | 247 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  dir-iterator.h                  |  35 ++++--
>  entry.c                         |  39 +++----
>  refs/files-backend.c            |   2 +-
>  t/helper/.gitignore             |   1 +
>  t/helper/test-dir-iterator.c    |  48 ++++++++
>  t/t0065-dir-iterator.sh         |  93 +++++++++++++++
>  t/t2000-checkout-cache-clash.sh |  11 ++
>  9 files changed, 373 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 t/helper/test-dir-iterator.c
>  create mode 100755 t/t0065-dir-iterator.sh
>
> --
> 2.7.4 (Apple Git-66)
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]