Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] propagating push-options, remote and refspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> v3 builds upon v2 by adding 3 additional patches to add functionality to also
> propagate the remote and refspec down to children process's working to push
> submodules.  The remote and refspec will only be propagated if the provided
> remote is configured. A remote provided in the form of a URL will cause the
> remote and refspec to not be propagated down to the submodules and instead the
> default remote and refspec will be used, preserving existing functionality.
> Currently the only supported LHS of a refspec must exactly match a single ref
> in the submodule (e.g. a branch name).
>
> Patches [1/5] and [2/5] remain unchanged from v2.

2/5 seems to be a bit different in 5545 ll.156,+6, though.

>
> Brandon Williams (5):
>   push: unmark a local variable as static
>   push: propagate push-options with --recurse-submodules
>   remote: expose parse_push_refspec function
>   submodule--helper: add push-check subcommand
>   push: propagate remote and refspec with --recurse-submodules
>
>  builtin/push.c                 |  5 +--
>  builtin/submodule--helper.c    | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  remote.c                       |  2 +-
>  remote.h                       |  1 +
>  submodule.c                    | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  submodule.h                    |  5 ++-
>  t/t5531-deep-submodule-push.sh | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  t/t5545-push-options.sh        | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  transport.c                    |  4 ++-
>  9 files changed, 219 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]