Re: [PATCH v2 00/20] Separate `ref_cache` into a separate module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramsay Jones <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> In that sense, Michael's series and Duy's later two series are
>> "tangled" (i.e. shares some common commits that are still not in
>> 'master').  If nd/files-backend-git-dir that is shared among them is
>> ever rebased, all of them need to be rebased on top of it
>> consistently.
>> 
>> But if either of nd/prune-in-worktree and nd/worktree-kill-parse-ref
>> needs to be rerolled, that can be done independently from Michael's
>> series, as long as nd/files-backend-git-dir is solid and unchanging.
>
> I suspected as much (hence the 'maybe not now' comment), but I noticed
> that all four branches were merged into 'jch'. So, it seemed possible
> to me that they were all being considered for merging into next.

Yes they were (and still are, but I do not expect they will be
moving to 'next' while I am offline ;-).  What you can do to help is
to review and say things like "nd/files-backend-git-dir and
Michael's one on top of it looked good, no opinion on others",
"the others have this and that issues that need a reroll", etc.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]