Re: [PATCH] [GSOC] prune_worktrees(): reimplement with dir_iterator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:29 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Robert Stanca <robert.stanca7@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Replaces recursive traversing of opendir with dir_iterator
>
> The original code for this one, and also the other one, is not
> recursive traversing.  This one enumerates all the _direct_
> subdirectories of ".git/worktrees", and feeds them to
> prune_worktree() without recursing.  The other one scans all the
> files _directly_ underneath ".git/objects/pack" to find the ones
> that begin with the packtmp prefix, and unlinks them without
> recursing.  Neither of them touches anything in subdirectory of
> ".git/worktrees/" nor ".git/objects/pack/".
>
> Using dir_iterator() to make it recursive is not just overkill but
> is a positively wrong change, isn't it?


Thanks for the review, and yes the commit message is misleading (my
bad there). I understood that remove_temp_files has no recursion
component to it and it removes all ".tmp-id-pack-" files from
/objects/pack , but shouldn't dir-iterator work even if there's no
recursion level?
My understanding of dir-iterator is that it is used for directory
iteration (recursive or not) and where are no subdirectories it's
basically recursive with level = 0 .



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]