Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Still, I'm not sure the extra layer of cache is all that valuable. It > should be a single hash lookup in the config cache (in an operation that > otherwise reads the entire index). OK, let's drop that part, then.
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Still, I'm not sure the extra layer of cache is all that valuable. It > should be a single hash lookup in the config cache (in an operation that > otherwise reads the entire index). OK, let's drop that part, then.