On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:06:48PM +0100, Thomas Gummerer wrote: > > Yeah, I think that would be fine. You _could_ write a t/perf test and > > then use your 400MB monstrosity as GIT_PERF_LARGE_REPO. But given that > > most people don't have such a thing, there's not much value over you > > just showing off the perf improvement in the commit message. > > Sorry if this was already discussed, but we already do have a perf > test for the index (p0002), and a corresponding helper program which > just does read_cache() and discard_cache(). Maybe we could re-use > that and add a second test running the same using the new config? Oh, indeed. Yes, I would think the results of p0002 would probably show off Jeff's improvements. -Peff