Re: FFmpeg considering GIT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Brett Schwarz writes:
> > As Shawn mentions below, he started using namespaces for git-gui. I
> > think gitk could benefit from that as well, along with a few other
> > changes.
> 
> Gitk ends up handling pretty significant amounts of data.  In
> particular the per-commit data can get to gigabytes, and processing it
> is pretty cpu-intensive.  I did try using namespaces for the
> per-commit data but I found that the performance hit to be more than I
> was willing to tolerate.

If that is the case then an obvious direction is to start using C
for the actual Git operations/datastore and Tcl/Tk for the basic
UI layout and event handlers.

If we go down that path for gitk then I may wind up doing the
same for git-gui.  Because gitk would require the tcl/tk heders
and libraries at that point, so also requiring them for git-gui
wouldn't be too unreasonable.

But fortunately git-gui doesn't have to deal with gigabytes
of data; I'm only really looking at the "dirty" stuff, or
at worst, the blame for an entire file.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]