Suppose I have a superproject 'super', with two submodules 'super/sub'
and 'super/sub1'. 'super/sub' itself contains a submodule
'super/sub/subsub'. Now suppose I run, from within 'super':
echo hi >sub/subsub/stray-file
echo hi >sub1/stray-file
Currently we get would see the following output in git-status:
git status --short
m sub
? sub1
With this patch applied, the untracked file in the nested submodule is
turned into an untracked file on the 'super' level as well.
git status --short
? sub
? sub1
This doesn't change the output of 'git status --porcelain=1' for nested
submodules, because its output is always ' M' for either untracked files
or local modifications no matter the nesting level of the submodule.
'git status --porcelain=2' is affected by this change in a nested
submodule, though. Without this patch it would report the direct submodule
as modified and having no untracked files. With this patch it would report
untracked files. Chalk this up as a bug fix.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/git-status.txt | 2 ++
submodule.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
t/t3600-rm.sh | 2 +-
t/t7506-status-submodule.sh | 2 +-
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-status.txt b/Documentation/git-status.txt
index 01b457c322..452c6eb875 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-status.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-status.txt
@@ -187,6 +187,8 @@ Submodules have more state and instead report
m the submodule has modified content
? the submodule has untracked files
+Note that 'm' and '?' are applied recursively, e.g. if a nested submodule
+in a submodule contains an untracked file, this is reported as '?' as well.
If -b is used the short-format status is preceded by a line
diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index fa21c7bb72..730cc9513a 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -1078,8 +1078,27 @@ unsigned is_submodule_modified(const char *path, int ignore_untracked)
/* regular untracked files */
if (buf.buf[0] == '?')
dirty_submodule |= DIRTY_SUBMODULE_UNTRACKED;
- else
- dirty_submodule |= DIRTY_SUBMODULE_MODIFIED;
+
+ if (buf.buf[0] == 'u' ||
+ buf.buf[0] == '1' ||
+ buf.buf[0] == '2') {
+ /*
+ * T XY SSSS:
+ * T = line type, XY = status, SSSS = submodule state
+ */
+ if (buf.len < 1 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 4)
+ die("BUG: invalid status --porcelain=2 line %s",
+ buf.buf);
+
+ /* regular unmerged and renamed files */
+ if (buf.buf[5] == 'S' && buf.buf[8] == 'U')
+ /* nested untracked file */
+ dirty_submodule |= DIRTY_SUBMODULE_UNTRACKED;
+
+ if (memcmp(buf.buf + 5, "S..U", 4))
+ /* other change */
+ dirty_submodule |= DIRTY_SUBMODULE_MODIFIED;
+ }
if ((dirty_submodule & DIRTY_SUBMODULE_MODIFIED) &&
((dirty_submodule & DIRTY_SUBMODULE_UNTRACKED) ||
diff --git a/t/t3600-rm.sh b/t/t3600-rm.sh
index a6e5c5bd56..b58793448b 100755
--- a/t/t3600-rm.sh
+++ b/t/t3600-rm.sh
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rm of a populated nested submodule with nested untracked fi
test -d submod &&
test -f submod/.git &&
git status -s -uno --ignore-submodules=none >actual &&
- test_cmp expect.modified_inside actual &&
+ test_cmp expect.modified_untracked actual &&
git rm -f submod &&
test ! -d submod &&
git status -s -uno --ignore-submodules=none >actual &&
diff --git a/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh b/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh
index fd057751df..4d6d8f6817 100755
--- a/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh
+++ b/t/t7506-status-submodule.sh
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status with untracked file in nested submodule (porcelain=2
git -C super status --porcelain=2 >output &&
awk -f suppress_hashes.awk output >output2 &&
diff output2 - <<-\EOF
- 1 .M S.M. 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub1
+ 1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub1
1 .M S..U 160000 160000 160000 HASH HASH sub2
EOF
'
--
2.12.1.438.g67623a8358