On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:29:18PM +0100, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>> case "$cur_" in
>> refs|refs/*)
>> format="refname"
>> - refs="${cur_%/*}"
>> + refs=("$match*" "$match*/**")
>> track=""
>
> Working on the aforementioned patch, I noticed that for-each-ref's
> matching is a little tricky due to its path semantics. So I wanted to
> double-check your patterns. :) I think these should do the right thing.
Yeah, I always thought that it's weird that globbing in for-each-ref
behaves differently from globbing in ls-remote or refspecs, but there
is nothing we can do about it now.
Anyway, this is why the tests added in this patch include e.g. both
'matching-branch' and 'matching/branch'.