Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] [GSoC] dir_iterator: iterate over dir after its contents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25/2017 07:12 PM, Daniel Ferreira wrote:
> Create an option for the dir_iterator API to iterate over a directory
> path only after having iterated through its contents. This feature was
> predicted, although not implemented by 0fe5043 ("dir_iterator: new API
> for iterating over a directory tree", 2016-06-18).
> 
> This is useful for recursively removing a directory and calling rmdir()
> on a directory only after all of its contents have been wiped.
> 
> An "options" member has been added to the dir_iterator struct. It
> contains the "iterate_dirs_after_files" flag, that enables the feature
> when set to 1. Default behavior continues to be iterating over directory
> paths before its contents.
> 
> Two inline functions have been added to dir_iterator's code to avoid
> code repetition inside dir_iterator_advance() and make code more clear.
> 
> No particular functions or wrappers for setting the options struct's
> fields have been added to avoid either breaking the current dir_iterator
> API or over-engineering an extremely simple option architecture.

This patch would be easier to read if it were split into two: one
extracting the new functions and changing old code to use them, and a
second adding the new functionality. As one patch, is is hard to see
quickly which changes have what purpose.

I also suggest adding a new `unsigned int flags` parameter to
`dir_iterator_begin`. I think that's more natural, because it doesn't
make sense to change the iteration order during an iteration. It's not
much of a problem to change the API given that all callers are in the
same codebase. If you were to forget to convert any callers (or if a
different in-flight patch series were to add a new caller using the old
call style), the compiler would complain, and the problem would be
obvious and easy to fix.

I didn't actually read the patch carefully yet because I don't have time
this evening to seek out the interesting parts in the long diff.

Michael

> [...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]