Hello there this is the first bug report of my life and I am not a native English speaker so, first of all, I would like to apologize for my English skills and the report itself (if it is not precise enough). I have already read this 'guidelines' http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html and I will try to attach to them as much as I can. What System I am running: * Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.6-3 (2017-01-28) x86_64 GNU/Linux * git version 2.11.0. Well actually, according to the apt-get install output (of course after apt-get update) -> git is already the newest version (1:2.11.0-2). * VIM - Vi IMproved 8.0 (2016 Sep 12, compiled Feb 13 2017 00:56:16) Included patches: 1-197, 322 What happened: I was working on my git repository yesterday and did a lot of changes in the file myfile.py. After a little bit of testing I was ready to commit them. I decided not to commit all of them at once (because these are non related changes), but instead I decided to use the -p option (as I always do in this case). For the first patch I decided to commit only all methods I have removed because these are not needed anymore. So my Idea was to jump from hunk to hunk and split them (using 's') to select (with 'y') only the parts I wanted to commit, ie, lines I had removed because they are not useful for me anymore. So I went for it and I did: git commit -p myfile.py Until this point all went as expected. The first hunk was printed in the console and the it waited for my decision. As always. After a couple of hunks I realized it was not possible to split all of them in a proper way (to select only removed lines) because new methods were mixed up with the old ones. So I cancel the process (ctrl + c) and started again using 'e' instead to manually edit the hunks. So I repeated the last command: git commit -p myfile.py but this time I only used 'y', 'n' and 'e'. All in all I edited ('e') two big hunks. By doing this, the default editor (vim in my case) opened showing the hunk and with the instructions in how to edit at the bottom. Everything as used to be. Until this point all went as I expected. In the two hunk I edited I did the same. I removed all + lines by deleting them and I make some - lines as context. Like explained in the bottom of the file. When I was done with each of the hunks, I saved and closed the editor. No error was produced (I sometimes make mistakes while editing a hunk and know you can get an error (patch does not apply) here, but in this case were no errors there so the next hunk was printed and the commit procedure kept going. When I was done with all hunks, the editor (vim) started again to write the commit message. I wrote (something like) this: myfile.py -> old unused methods removed... 1) mymethod1 2) mymethod2 3) mymethod3 4) mymethod4 5) mymethod5 Yes, not the best commit ever ;) but enough for us in this case. Anyway, I saved it and close the editor and I was surprised by the git output. [master 96d1c24] myfile.py -> old unused methods removed... 1 file changed, 182 insertions(+), 302 deletions(-) rewrite myfile.py (60%) What?? I thought to myself... Insertions?? This can't be true? I removed all + lines, my idea was to commit only deletions... What did I wrong? To check this I did * git show 96d1c24 and I saw only red minus lines , ie, deletions. As I expected. To check it twice I used tig too. tig showed the same for this specific commit myfile.py | 120 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 120 deletions(-) Conclusion: After these two checks I am sure I did what I intended to do. What I do not understand is the output of git when I was done with the commit. Maybe is just me, because I do not understand how git commit -p when using 'e' to edit hunks works. But as user I would expect to see only deletions in the output message if I am picking only deletions. If this is a bug, I hope you can reproduce it on your system. If not, do not hesitate to contact me for further information. Kind regards, Joan Aguilar -- Joan Aguilar Lorente