Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Hmph, wouldn't we want to instead replace it with >> >> ... something to set expectation ... >expect && >> git tag -n 100 >actual && >> test_cmp expect actual && >> >> here? > > Nope, we already have detailed tests for "tag -n 100" and the like and > what that output should actually return earlier in the patch,... Then what you did is the right thing to do. Thanks.