Re: [PATCH v6 02/27] files-backend: make files_log_ref_write() static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 19/03/17 19:10, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 03/18/2017 03:03 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> Created in 5f3c3a4e6f (files_log_ref_write: new function - 2015-11-10)
>> but probably never used outside refs-internal.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  refs/files-backend.c | 3 +++
>>  refs/refs-internal.h | 4 ----
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c
>> index 50188e92f9..0a6d2bf6bc 100644
>> --- a/refs/files-backend.c
>> +++ b/refs/files-backend.c
>> @@ -165,6 +165,9 @@ static struct ref_entry *create_dir_entry(struct files_ref_store *ref_store,
>>  					  const char *dirname, size_t len,
>>  					  int incomplete);
>>  static void add_entry_to_dir(struct ref_dir *dir, struct ref_entry *entry);
>> +static int files_log_ref_write(const char *refname, const unsigned char *old_sha1,
>> +			       const unsigned char *new_sha1, const char *msg,
>> +			       int flags, struct strbuf *err);
>>  
>>  static struct ref_dir *get_ref_dir(struct ref_entry *entry)
>>  {
>> diff --git a/refs/refs-internal.h b/refs/refs-internal.h
>> index fa93c9a32e..f732473e1d 100644
>> --- a/refs/refs-internal.h
>> +++ b/refs/refs-internal.h
>> @@ -228,10 +228,6 @@ struct ref_transaction {
>>  	enum ref_transaction_state state;
>>  };
>>  
>> -int files_log_ref_write(const char *refname, const unsigned char *old_sha1,
>> -			const unsigned char *new_sha1, const char *msg,
>> -			int flags, struct strbuf *err);
>> -
>>  /*
>>   * Check for entries in extras that are within the specified
>>   * directory, where dirname is a reference directory name including
>>
> 
> You changed the declaration, but the definition still makes the function
> non-static.

Actually, this is a static symbol, since it's 'static-ness' derives
from the above forward declaration.

However, as I said in a previous email, this tickles sparse to issue
a warning. In addition, simply adding 'static' to the definition
(ie simply _don't_ do the forward declaration) is less work! :-D

ATB,
Ramsay Jones





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]