Hi, Stefan Beller wrote: > Add the flag --show-superproject-working-tree to git-rev-parse > to make it easy to find out if there is a superproject. When no > superproject exists, the output will be empty. I'm a little late for this, but think it's better to comment late than never. After this patch, git rev-parse has two options relating to the working tree: git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree git rev-parse --show-superproject-working-tree Is this inconsistency necessary? Now that there is a "git worktree" command that allows making a second working tree for the same repository, I would have thought we had standardized on work tree as the name in UI. Thoughts? Jonathan