Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 15.03.2017 20:25: > Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> git-prompt has various describe styles, among them "describe" (by >> annotated tags) and "default" (by exact match with any tag). >> >> Add a mode "tag" that describes by any tag, annotated or not. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh >> index 97eacd7832..c6cbef38c2 100644 >> --- a/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh >> +++ b/contrib/completion/git-prompt.sh >> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ >> # contains relative to newer annotated tag (v1.6.3.2~35) >> # branch relative to newer tag or branch (master~4) >> # describe relative to older annotated tag (v1.6.3.1-13-gdd42c2f) >> +# tag relative to any older tag (v1.6.3.1-13-gdd42c2f) > > I guess this feature makes sense. > > I just wish we had a well-known unannotated tag we can use for such > an example; using v1.6.3.1 that is annotated does not help to make > the distinctin between describe and tag stand out. We want to > convey "both annotated one and unannotated one can be used". > > I am wondering if it makes sense to do something like this instead: > > # tag similar to 'describe' but also allow unannotated tags or inventing a local lightweight tag such as "lastgood-5-gbadbad"). Either way would be fine with me. (I guess it's in next as is now.) >> # default exactly matching tag >> # >> # If you would like a colored hint about the current dirty state, set >> @@ -443,6 +444,8 @@ __git_ps1 () >> git describe --contains HEAD ;; >> (branch) >> git describe --contains --all HEAD ;; >> + (tag) >> + git describe --tags HEAD ;; >> (describe) >> git describe HEAD ;; >> (* | default)