Re: sequencer "edit" command always issues a warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peff,

On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Jeff King wrote:

> I was rebasing with the new built-in sequencer code today, and I was
> surprised to see the use of warning() here:
> 
>   $ git rebase -i
>   [set one commit to 'edit']
>   warning: stopped at 6ce6b914a... odb_pack_keep(): stop generating keepfile name
>   You can amend the commit now, with
>     [...more instructions...]
> 
> It alarmed me for a minute until I realized that no, this is nothing to
> be alarmed about, but just git doing exactly what I told it to do.
> 
> The original just wrote:
> 
>   Stopped at 6ce6b914a... odb_pack_keep(): stop generating keepfile name
> 
> It would be easy to switch back:
> 
> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index 1f729b053..8183a83c1 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -1997,7 +1997,8 @@ static int pick_commits(struct todo_list *todo_list, struct replay_opts *opts)
>  			if (item->command == TODO_EDIT) {
>  				struct commit *commit = item->commit;
>  				if (!res)
> -					warning(_("stopped at %s... %.*s"),
> +					fprintf(stderr,
> +						_("Stopped at %s...  %.*s"),
>  						short_commit_name(commit),
>  						item->arg_len, item->arg);
>  				return error_with_patch(commit,
> 
> and that would match most of the other messages that the command issues,
> which use a bare fprintf() and start with a capital letter. But I'm not
> sure if there was some reason to treat this one differently.

I do not recall why I chose warning(); probably just an oversight on my
part. Your patch looks good.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]