Re: [PATCH 0/2] Teach name-rev to pay more attention to lightweight tags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Here is a reroll of what I did in
>
>     http://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqd1die00j.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Junio C Hamano (2):
>   name-rev: refactor logic to see if a new candidate is a better name
>   name-rev: favor describing with tags and use committer date to tiebreak
>
>  builtin/name-rev.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  t/t4202-log.sh     |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.12.0-306-g4a9b9b32d4
>

This looks like an improvement to me. It may be that someone comes up
with a better definition for is_better_name() but it's definitely much
easier to do so now as it's easier to understand what the logic is
when it's separated out.

Thanks,
Jake



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]