Re: [PATCH v2] http-walker: fix buffer underflow processing remote alternates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> but we do not add back in the "/" when making requests. So technically:
>
>   ../some-path/my-objects
>
> works now, and would not if we were more picky. I doubt anybody cares,
> but I went for the minimal behavior change here. If anybody wants to get
> more fancy, the correct path is to leave the path intact here and teach
> the appending side to stop re-adding "objects".

Yeah.  I admit that I didn't spend too much time last night auditing
the code but I didn't find anything that adds things like "info/refs"
that results in a URL outside the original "/objects", so I agree
that "don't strip and don't re-add 'objects'" would be the right way
to go if anybody cares deeply enough.  Let's leave that for others
and take this one.

Thanks.

> -- >8 --
> Subject: http-walker: fix buffer underflow processing remote alternates
>
> If we parse a remote alternates (or http-alternates), we
> expect relative lines like:
>
>   ../../foo.git/objects
>
> which we convert into "$URL/../foo.git/" (and then use that
> as a base for fetching more objects).
>
> But if the remote feeds us nonsense like just:
>
>   ../
>
> we will try to blindly strip the last 7 characters, assuming
> they contain the string "objects". Since we don't _have_ 7
> characters at all, this results in feeding a small negative
> value to strbuf_add(), which converts it to a size_t,
> resulting in a big positive value. This should consistently
> fail (since we can't generall allocate the max size_t minus
> 7 bytes), so there shouldn't be any security implications.
>
> Let's fix this by using strbuf_strip_suffix() to drop the
> characters we want. If they're not present, we'll ignore the
> alternate (in theory we could use it as-is, but the rest of
> the http-walker code unconditionally tacks "objects/" back
> on, so it is it not prepared to handle such a case).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  http-walker.c | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/http-walker.c b/http-walker.c
> index b34b6ace7..507c200f0 100644
> --- a/http-walker.c
> +++ b/http-walker.c
> @@ -296,13 +296,16 @@ static void process_alternates_response(void *callback_data)
>  					okay = 1;
>  				}
>  			}
> -			/* skip "objects\n" at end */
>  			if (okay) {
>  				struct strbuf target = STRBUF_INIT;
>  				strbuf_add(&target, base, serverlen);
> -				strbuf_add(&target, data + i, posn - i - 7);
> -
> -				if (is_alternate_allowed(target.buf)) {
> +				strbuf_add(&target, data + i, posn - i);
> +				if (!strbuf_strip_suffix(&target, "objects")) {
> +					warning("ignoring alternate that does"
> +						" not end in 'objects': %s",
> +						target.buf);
> +					strbuf_release(&target);
> +				} else if (is_alternate_allowed(target.buf)) {
>  					warning("adding alternate object store: %s",
>  						target.buf);
>  					newalt = xmalloc(sizeof(*newalt));



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]