hoi :) On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:17:35PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > we could also introduce "<tree-ish>/<path>" for absolute path entries. > > > > > > When you name the tree-ish with usual "branch name", where does > > > the branch name end and pathname start? What happens when there > > > is an ambiguity, and how costly to detect such an ambiguity to > > > begin with? > > > > well, if you know that it starts with a tree-ish there is no > > ambiguity [...] > > Wrong. For example, mw/submodules~10 _is_ a tree-ish (if you have a branch > named "mw/submodules"). so what? a better argument is that one can have both refs/tags/a and refs/heads/a/b. So just forget my suggestion... -- Martin Waitz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature