Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think I just copy pasted the code from cmd_rev_list() in > builtin-rev-list.c and probably didn't realize that revs->tree_objects > would always be false. > > Thanks for spotting this and removing the dead code. Thanks for a quick confirmation. Just FYI I was looking at this code because I was trying to assess how involved it would be to teach the code to do a bisection only on the first-parent chain.