Re: [PATCH v1] Travis: also test on 32-bit Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 04 Mar 2017, at 05:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> I only recently started looking at Travis logs, so I cannot tell if
>> it is just a usual flake (e.g. some builds a few days ago seems to
>> have failed due to not being able to check out the tree being
>> tested, which I do not think is our fault) that we shouldn't worry
>> about, or if it is a sign of a real problem.
> 
> Tonight's pushout also seems to stall the same way. Dscho's
> unversioned one didn't exhibit the problem?
> https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/206811396

Did Travis find our first 32bit bug? I briefly looked into it
and the following new topic on pu seems to cause the issue:

http://public-inbox.org/git/20170302172902.16850-1-allan.x.xavier@xxxxxxxxxx/
https://github.com/git/git/commit/aaae0bf787f09ba102f69c3cf85d37e6554ab9fd

The "git log" call in the new 4211 test fails with:
*** Error in `/usr/src/git/git': malloc: top chunk is corrupt: 0x09ff4a78 ***

More output here:
https://travis-ci.org/larsxschneider/git/builds/207715343



>> Unrelated to linux-32, the same build has hard failure with Apple
>> clang in t0021 with the rot13-filter.pl thing, by the way.
> 
> This one may be a Heisenbug which may indicate some raciness in the
> clean/smudge filter protocol.
> The latest build of 'pu' https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/207550171 seems to
> have passed OK.

I agree, there seems to be some kind of race condition in
"t0021.15 - required process filter should filter data". I try to
look into it.


- Lars



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]