Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Fix the early config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peff,

On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Jeff King wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 03:03:56AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > These patches are an attempt to make Git's startup sequence a bit less
> > surprising.
> > 
> > The idea here is to discover the .git/ directory gently (i.e. without
> > changing the current working directory, or global variables), and to
> > use it to read the .git/config file early, before we actually called
> > setup_git_directory() (if we ever do that).
> 
> Thanks for working on this. I think it's a huge improvement over the
> status quo, and over the earlier attempt. I don't see anything hugely
> wrong with this series, though I did note one bug, along with some minor
> refinements.

Thank you very much for your review. You did point out a couple of things
I overlooked, and while it was a pain in the back to go from v1 to v2
(i.e. avoiding code duplication, which immediately put the changed code to
a huge test by having the very central setup_git_directory() use it), I
really believe that we are better off because the patch series pays off
more technical debt now than it introduces.

> > My dirty little secret is that I actually need this for something else
> > entirely. I need to patch an internal version of Git to gather
> > statistics, and to that end I need to read the config before and after
> > running every Git command. Hence the need for a gentle, and correct
> > early config.
> 
> We do something similar at GitHub, but it falls into two categories:
> 
>   - stat-gathering that's on all the time, so doesn't need to look at
>     config (I'm not sure in your case if you want to trigger the
>     gathering with config, or if config is just one of the things you
>     are gathering).
> 
>   - logging that is turned on selectively for some repos, but which
>     doesn't have to be looked up until we know we are in a repo

You probably guessed what I need to do, anyway: for our GVFS usage, we
need some telemetry (i.e. usage statistics), and I basically want to run a
hook whenever any Git command is called, but only on GVFS-enabled
repositories.

So it is somewhat related, but slightly different from your usage.

> I looked into making something upstream-able, and my approach was to
> allow GIT_TRACE_* variables to be specified in the config. But of course
> that ran into the early-config problem (and I really wanted repo-level
> config there, because I'd like to be able to turn on tracing for just a
> single problematic repo).
> 
> So not really something you need to work on, but maybe food for thought
> as you work on your internal project.

Right, GIT_TRACE_* settings in the config should be doable now.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]