Re: 'upstream' branches.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Woodhouse, Sat, May 05, 2007 19:50:28 +0200:
> > > 
> > > Is there a better way?
> > 
> > I would just remove the pluses. git-fetch will say that the branch is
> > already up-to-date, if the local branch already has everything the
> > remote has.
> 
> Then after I pull from Linus' tree, I can't pull from the mtd tree -- it
> complains that the 'linus' branch there can't be fast-forwarded, and
> refuses to pull the 'master' branch.

Which got me by surprise (just tried). I though it'd notice that all
the commits are already present...

Experts, is it really supposed to be that way?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]