Re: [PATCH 5/5] ls-files: fix bug when recuring with relative pathspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/28, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Fix a bug which causes a child process for a submodule to error out when a
> > relative pathspec with a ".." is provided in the superproject.
> >
> > While at it, correctly construct the super-prefix to be used in a submodule
> > when not at the root of the repository.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  builtin/ls-files.c                     | 8 ++++++--
> >  t/t3007-ls-files-recurse-submodules.sh | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/builtin/ls-files.c b/builtin/ls-files.c
> > index 159229081..89533ab8e 100644
> > --- a/builtin/ls-files.c
> > +++ b/builtin/ls-files.c
> > @@ -194,12 +194,15 @@ static void compile_submodule_options(const struct dir_struct *dir, int show_tag
> >  static void show_gitlink(const struct cache_entry *ce)
> >  {
> >  	struct child_process cp = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
> > +	struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
> >  	int status;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > +	quote_path_relative(ce->name, prefix, &name);
> >  	argv_array_pushf(&cp.args, "--super-prefix=%s%s/",
> 
> Same comment as 3/5.  quote_path is to produce c-quote and is not
> even meant for shell script quoting.  run_command() interface would
> do its own shell quoting when needed, so  I think you just want the
> exact string you want to pass here.
> 

Yeah I don't know what I was thinking when using that instead of
'relative_path()'.  Will change for this and 3/5.

-- 
Brandon Williams



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]