Re: [PATCH 1/3] revision: unify {tree,blob}_objects in rev_info

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:42:44PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > It could be argued that in the future, Git might need to distinguish
>> > tree_objects from blob_objects - in particular, a user might want
>> > rev-list to print the trees but not the blobs. 
>> 
>> That was exactly why these bits were originally made to "appear
>> independent but in practice nobody sets only one and leaves others
>> off".  
>> 
>> And it didn't happen in the past 10 years, which tells us that we
>> should take this patch.
>
> I actually have a patch which uses the distinction. It's for
> upload-archive doing reachability checks (which seems rather familiar to
> what's going on here).

OK.  Thanks for stopping me ;-)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]