Re: [PATCH v5 24/24] t1406: new tests for submodule ref store

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The for-each-ref iteration is defined to be sorted by refname, but it's
> true that the for-each-reflog order is undefined.

Thanks. I'm going to add a few lines about this near for_each_ref and
for_each_reflog() then, assuming that this is the desired behavior,
not a bug. (Another patch, because I'm not happy until it gets 30+)
-- 
Duy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]