Re: Delta compression not so effective

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Delta compression not so effective
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:17:14 -0800
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAPc5daWXafzN0dpyd+kdHcLU_YSmZpiNz_i2rXn_2hbMN-9Xww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4d2a1852-8c84-2869-78ad-3c863f6dcaf7@gmail.com> <CAPc5daWXafzN0dpyd+kdHcLU_YSmZpiNz_i2rXn_2hbMN-9Xww@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Just a hunch. s/F/f/ perhaps?  "-F" does not allow Git to recover from poor

Nah, sorry for the noise. Between -F and -f there shouldn't be any difference.

References:
- Delta compression not so effective
  - From: Marius Storm-Olsen
- Re: Delta compression not so effective
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 24/24] t1406: new tests for submodule ref store
Next by Date: Re: Delta compression not so effective
Previous by thread: Re: Delta compression not so effective
Next by thread: Re: Delta compression not so effective
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]