"Dana How" <danahow@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 5/4/07, Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > I'm not sure about "<tree-ish>:<path>" with <path> being relative by >> > default. For me it is <path> in <tree-ish> (like in >> > "git-ls-tree -r <tree-ish>" result). >> >> That's right (and Dscho is also). >> >> "v1.5.1:git.c" IS "git.c that appears at the toplevel of >> v1.5.1's tree." >> >> Ok, for now let's forget about this relative stuff. > > Hmm, most of the work I do in the parts of our > perforce repository I want to convert to git is > far enough down... The key word in my statement is "for now". I simply declared that I do not want to think about it further until 1.5.2 final, that's all. I am not opposed to give an escape hatch for your problem; I am quite in favor of that, and I think Alex/J6t's "./" syntax is a reasonable compromise. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html