Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] delete_ref: accept a reflog message argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> You'll probably want to update the comment block above if msg can be
> NULL. We have _very_ good documentation in this file, let's keep it
> uptodate.

Looking at how other functions in refs.h document their "msg" or
"logmsg" parameter, none seem to mention it explicitly.  update_ref
refers to ref_transaction_update, and
ref_transaction_{update,create,delete,verify} refer to ref.h's
"Reference transaction updates" comment.

delete_ref's docstring already mentions that "flag" is passed to
ref_transaction_delete, so perhaps it should mention "msg" here as
well.

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] delete_ref: mention "msg" parameter in docstring

delete_ref() was recently extended to take a "msg" argument.
---
 refs.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/refs.h b/refs.h
index e529f4c3a..988750218 100644
--- a/refs.h
+++ b/refs.h
@@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ int reflog_exists(const char *refname);
  * verify that the current value of the reference is old_sha1 before
  * deleting it. If old_sha1 is NULL, delete the reference if it
  * exists, regardless of its old value. It is an error for old_sha1 to
- * be NULL_SHA1. flags is passed through to ref_transaction_delete().
+ * be NULL_SHA1. msg and flags are passed through to
+ * ref_transaction_delete().
  */
 int delete_ref(const char *msg, const char *refname,
 	       const unsigned char *old_sha1, unsigned int flags);
-- 
2.11.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]