New test to expose a bug in filter-branch whereby the root commit is never pruned, even though its tree is empty and --prune-empty is given. The setup isn't exactly pretty, but I couldn't think of a simpler way to create a parallel commit graph sans the first commit. Signed-off-by: Devin J. Pohly <djpohly@xxxxxxxxx> --- t/t7003-filter-branch.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh b/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh index cb8fbd8e5..2dfe46250 100755 --- a/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh +++ b/t/t7003-filter-branch.sh @@ -313,6 +313,27 @@ test_expect_success 'Tag name filtering allows slashes in tag names' ' git cat-file tag X/2 > actual && test_cmp expect actual ' +test_expect_success 'setup --prune-empty comparisons' ' + git checkout --orphan master-no-a && + git rm -rf . && + unset test_tick && + test_tick && + GIT_COMMITTER_DATE="@0 +0000" GIT_AUTHOR_DATE="@0 +0000" && + test_commit --notick B B.t B Bx && + git checkout -b branch-no-a Bx && + test_commit D D.t D Dx && + mkdir dir && + test_commit dir/D dir/D.t dir/D dir/Dx && + test_commit E E.t E Ex && + git checkout master-no-a && + test_commit C C.t C Cx && + git checkout branch-no-a && + git merge Cx -m "Merge tag '\''C'\'' into branch" && + git tag Fx && + test_commit G G.t G Gx && + test_commit H H.t H Hx && + git checkout branch +' test_expect_success 'Prune empty commits' ' git rev-list HEAD > expect && @@ -341,6 +362,15 @@ test_expect_success 'prune empty works even without index/tree filters' ' test_cmp expect actual ' +test_expect_success '--prune-empty is able to prune root commit' ' + git rev-list branch-no-a >expect && + git branch testing H && + git filter-branch -f --prune-empty --index-filter "git update-index --remove A.t" testing && + git rev-list testing >actual && + git branch -D testing && + test_cmp expect actual +' + test_expect_success '--remap-to-ancestor with filename filters' ' git checkout master && git reset --hard A && -- 2.11.1