Re: possible bug: inconsistent CLI behaviour for empty user.name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:13:09AM +0100, bs.x.ttp@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> The problem is that GIT accepts a user.name of " " for some operations
> (for example when doing a simple "git commit"), but does require a
> "non-empty" user.name for others (like git commit --amend and git
> rebase). In case of the latter commands GIT fails with the message
> "fatal: empty ident name (for <email@address>) not allowed".

I think it's a bug. We try to always reject empty usernames, but the
"empty" check is done before we cut off leading and trailing cruft (like
whitespace).

The "--amend" command notices because it actually parses the name out of
the existing commit. That version has already had its whitespace eaten
up (when it was written into the original commit), and so it ends up as
blank.

Here's a series which fixes that along with a few other oddities I
noticed.

  [1/4]: ident: mark error messages for translation
  [2/4]: ident: handle NULL email when complaining of empty name
  [3/4]: ident: reject all-crud ident name
  [4/4]: ident: do not ignore empty config name/email

 ident.c                       | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 t/t7518-ident-corner-cases.sh | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
 create mode 100755 t/t7518-ident-corner-cases.sh


-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]