Re: [RFD/PATCH] Implement pack.compression and pack-objects --compression=N

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 4 May 2007, Dana How wrote:

> Now that I'm awake your original quote at the top suggests:
> (a) zlib_compression_level =
>     isset(core.loosecompression) ? core.loosecompression :
>     isset(core.compression) ? core.compression : Z_BEST_SPEED;
> (b) pack_compression_level =
>     isset(pack.compression) ? pack.compression :
>     isset(core.compression) ? core.compression : Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION;
> 
> Your later reaction to my quoted (a)/(b) table suggests:
> (a) zlib_compression_level =
>     isset(core.compression) ? core.compression : Z_BEST_SPEED;
> (b) pack_compresion_level =
>     isset(pack.compression) ? pack.compression : Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION;

My final comment is that I think the former looks more coherent, while 
the later is simpler to implement.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]