On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:25:37PM +0000, Sokolov, Konstantin wrote: > Thanks for going into the issue. As far as I understand 2.12 won't > change the discussed behavior of --procelain. We will switch to > --line-procelain. After the current discussion it seems to be less > error prone, more future-proof and our current parser can handle it > without any changes. Right, the 2.12 change is only fixing a case where the "previous" key/value line was not repeated at the correct spots. The same parsing rules still hold. -Peff